• Skip to site navigation
  • Skip to blog entries
  • Skip to archive page
  • Skip to left sidebar
  • Skip to right sidebar

Lary Holland: Official Blog, Links, and Resources

Entries from July 2007

  • This Blog
  • Nationwide Blue Print
  • Get Your Justice Live
  • Myspace:Lary Holland
  • Myspace:GYJL


Sunday, July 29. 2007

Child Support Clerk Charged With Embezzlement: More Government Corruption


The place is Meridian, Mississippi and the alleged crime is EMBEZZLEMENT. I have been covering stories surrounding the leeches that have been involved in the free for all welfare program, created under the guise of "child support enforcement," known as the Title IV-D Program. The program is already stealing from taxpayers by forcing the inclusion of the middle-class and upper-class families in to the program but now there is definitely an upward trend associated with theft from the program itself by the County cooperative contract employees demonstrating a need for citizen oversight. We cannot entrust these employees to manage money, let alone make recommendations to what is best for our children.

Another County employee, this one in Lauderdale County, has been indicted by a grand jury on felony embezzlement charges for allegedly stealing more than $216,000.00 of program money, paid for by taxpayers, by writing unauthorized checks to herself from January 2002 through April of 2007. This employee was released on a $10,000.00 bond, which no doubt was probably a drop in the bucket considering she has already been sitting on the $216,000.00 plus her lush salary.


Just last month we shared with you several other thefts, forgeries, and frauds that are overshadowing the agency that focuses on services to the greedy instead of services to the needy. Agencies across the nation are focusing collection efforts on middle and upper-class families and drowning out the voice of the needy, while apparently stealing some for themselves too. (http://www.nationwideblueprint.com)

  • Two Maine Media Outlets Report More Thieving Title IV-D/CSE Employees: http://www.laryholland.com/serendipity/archives/367-Two-Maine-Media-Outlets-Report-More-Thieving-Title-IV-DCSE-Employees.html
  • Fort Bend Woman Guilty in Child Support Ring: http://www.laryholland.com/serendipity/archives/366-Fort-Bend-Woman-Guilty-in-Child-Support-Fraud-Ring.html
  • Child Support Worker Arrested In Bribery Scheme: http://www.laryholland.com/serendipity/archives/329-Child-Support-Worker-Arrested-in-Bribery-Scheme.html
  • Title IV-D Employee Embezzles Quarter of Million in Child Support Money: http://www.laryholland.com/serendipity/archives/311-Title-IV-D-Employee-Embezzles-Quarter-of-Million-in-Child-Support-Enforcement-Money.html

    It's definitely time to cut down this oversized government child support collection service bureaucracy and restore some safety controls to prevent it from stealing from parents, children, and the nation's taxpayers. It's time to shrink this agency back to only providing services to actual needy families, instead of forcing collections from middle and upper-income families at taxpayer expense.

  • Posted by
    Lary Holland
    in Articles, Title IV-D Welfare at 15:50 | Comment (1) | Trackbacks (0)
    Defined tags for this entry: articles, embezzlement, lary holland, maine, office of child support enforcement, social security act, theft, title iv, title iv part d, title iv-d, title iv-d program, title iv-d reform, title iv-d welfare, title iv-program
    Bookmark Child Support Clerk Charged With Embezzlement: More Government Corruption  at del.icio.us Digg Child Support Clerk Charged With Embezzlement: More Government Corruption Mixx Child Support Clerk Charged With Embezzlement: More Government Corruption Bloglines Child Support Clerk Charged With Embezzlement: More Government Corruption Technorati Child Support Clerk Charged With Embezzlement: More Government Corruption Fark this: Child Support Clerk Charged With Embezzlement: More Government Corruption Bookmark Child Support Clerk Charged With Embezzlement: More Government Corruption  at YahooMyWeb Bookmark Child Support Clerk Charged With Embezzlement: More Government Corruption  at Furl.net Bookmark Child Support Clerk Charged With Embezzlement: More Government Corruption  at reddit.com Bookmark Child Support Clerk Charged With Embezzlement: More Government Corruption  at blinklist.com Bookmark Child Support Clerk Charged With Embezzlement: More Government Corruption  at Spurl.net Bookmark Child Support Clerk Charged With Embezzlement: More Government Corruption  at NewsVine Bookmark Child Support Clerk Charged With Embezzlement: More Government Corruption  at Simpy.com Bookmark Child Support Clerk Charged With Embezzlement: More Government Corruption  at blogmarks Bookmark Child Support Clerk Charged With Embezzlement: More Government Corruption  with wists Bookmark Child Support Clerk Charged With Embezzlement: More Government Corruption  at Ma.gnolia.com wong it! Bookmark using any bookmark manager! Stumble It!

    Saturday, July 28. 2007

    Equal Parenting Bike Trek: Robert Pedersen & Rob Mackenzie


    Robert Pedersen & Rob Mackenzie are preparing to venture from the Michigan State Capitol Building all the way to Washington D.C. starting August 11th, 2007.


    Posted by
    Lary Holland
    in People and Faces, Protests at 07:17 | Comment (1) | Trackbacks (0)
    Defined tags for this entry: Best Life, bike trek, equal parenting, lansing, michigan, people and faces, protests, rob mackenzie, robert pedersen, washington d.c.
    Bookmark Equal Parenting Bike Trek: Robert Pedersen & Rob Mackenzie  at del.icio.us Digg Equal Parenting Bike Trek: Robert Pedersen & Rob Mackenzie Mixx Equal Parenting Bike Trek: Robert Pedersen & Rob Mackenzie Bloglines Equal Parenting Bike Trek: Robert Pedersen & Rob Mackenzie Technorati Equal Parenting Bike Trek: Robert Pedersen & Rob Mackenzie Fark this: Equal Parenting Bike Trek: Robert Pedersen & Rob Mackenzie Bookmark Equal Parenting Bike Trek: Robert Pedersen & Rob Mackenzie  at YahooMyWeb Bookmark Equal Parenting Bike Trek: Robert Pedersen & Rob Mackenzie  at Furl.net Bookmark Equal Parenting Bike Trek: Robert Pedersen & Rob Mackenzie  at reddit.com Bookmark Equal Parenting Bike Trek: Robert Pedersen & Rob Mackenzie  at blinklist.com Bookmark Equal Parenting Bike Trek: Robert Pedersen & Rob Mackenzie  at Spurl.net Bookmark Equal Parenting Bike Trek: Robert Pedersen & Rob Mackenzie  at NewsVine Bookmark Equal Parenting Bike Trek: Robert Pedersen & Rob Mackenzie  at Simpy.com Bookmark Equal Parenting Bike Trek: Robert Pedersen & Rob Mackenzie  at blogmarks Bookmark Equal Parenting Bike Trek: Robert Pedersen & Rob Mackenzie  with wists Bookmark Equal Parenting Bike Trek: Robert Pedersen & Rob Mackenzie  at Ma.gnolia.com wong it! Bookmark using any bookmark manager! Stumble It!

    Monday, July 23. 2007

    NEW RESEARCH: Lethally Reliable Predictor: Divorce is Equated to Homicide


    Divorce rate linked to higher bloodshed through the occurrence of Homicides based on County by County data, as opposed to the issues relating to unemployment. In four out of five of Phillips’s statistical models, the county divorce rate emerges as a statistically significant predictor of the homicide rate (p < 0.05 in all four models). “On average,” Phillips accordingly observes, “higher levels of the percentage of the population divorced are associated with larger homicide rates within counties over time.”



    Lethally Reliable Predictor


    Criminologists have long believed that murder rates will climb when the number
    of young people grows, especially in areas where unemployment runs high and
    urban populations are growing. However, a new study by
    Rutgers sociologist Julie A. Phillips suggests that the homicide rate may
    track less closely than previously thought with the size of population centers
    or with the number or employment status of the young people.
    But one all-too-certain portent of murder remains: namely, divorce.


    Examining county-by-county data collected between 1970 and 1999, Phillips
    uncovers a pattern that contradicts rather than confirms conventional wisdom
    among criminologists. In analyses that she calls “intriguing,” Phillips shows
    that the statistical relationships between homicide rates on the one hand and
    unemployment and population size on the other are both negative, so
    manifesting “effects that run contrary to common theoretical expectations.”


    As most criminologists would expect, Phillips does discern “a positive
    association between the proportion [of] young [in various areas] and homicide
    rates within U.S. counties across time.” But Phillips’s
    multi-variable analysis establishes that “criminogenic forces, such as poor
    social conditions…, can alter the association between the relative size of the
    young population and homicide rates.”


    One particular social measure especially helps Phillips recognize areas with
    the kind of “low social control” that looses murderous
    impulses, even if those impulses are “less heavily concentrated in the young
    age ranges” in the affected areas than some theorists might have expected.
    The indicator of social breakdown that Phillips highlights as a
    predictor of murder is the divorce rate.


    Unlike elevated unemployment rates and burgeoning population size—both
    surprisingly linked to lower homicide rates—high divorce rates do augur
    bloodshed. In four out of five of Phillips’s statistical
    models, the county divorce rate emerges as a statistically significant
    predictor of the homicide rate (p < 0.05 in all four models).
    “On average,” Phillips accordingly observes, “higher levels of the
    percentage of the population divorced are associated with larger homicide
    rates within counties over time.”


    County coroners, it appears, will often be called on for grim duties wherever
    the divorce courts are busy.


    (Source: Julie A. Phillips, “The Relationship Between Age Structure and
    Homicide Rates in the United States, 1970 to 1999,” Journal of Research in
    Crime and Delinquency 43 [2006]: 230-260.)

    Posted by
    Lary Holland
    in Studies at 15:05 | Comments (0) | Trackbacks (0)
    Defined tags for this entry: crime, custody, delinquency, divorce, divorce rate, homicide, howard center, new research, studies
    Bookmark NEW RESEARCH: Lethally Reliable Predictor: Divorce is Equated to Homicide  at del.icio.us Digg NEW RESEARCH: Lethally Reliable Predictor: Divorce is Equated to Homicide Mixx NEW RESEARCH: Lethally Reliable Predictor: Divorce is Equated to Homicide Bloglines NEW RESEARCH: Lethally Reliable Predictor: Divorce is Equated to Homicide Technorati NEW RESEARCH: Lethally Reliable Predictor: Divorce is Equated to Homicide Fark this: NEW RESEARCH: Lethally Reliable Predictor: Divorce is Equated to Homicide Bookmark NEW RESEARCH: Lethally Reliable Predictor: Divorce is Equated to Homicide  at YahooMyWeb Bookmark NEW RESEARCH: Lethally Reliable Predictor: Divorce is Equated to Homicide  at Furl.net Bookmark NEW RESEARCH: Lethally Reliable Predictor: Divorce is Equated to Homicide  at reddit.com Bookmark NEW RESEARCH: Lethally Reliable Predictor: Divorce is Equated to Homicide  at blinklist.com Bookmark NEW RESEARCH: Lethally Reliable Predictor: Divorce is Equated to Homicide  at Spurl.net Bookmark NEW RESEARCH: Lethally Reliable Predictor: Divorce is Equated to Homicide  at NewsVine Bookmark NEW RESEARCH: Lethally Reliable Predictor: Divorce is Equated to Homicide  at Simpy.com Bookmark NEW RESEARCH: Lethally Reliable Predictor: Divorce is Equated to Homicide  at blogmarks Bookmark NEW RESEARCH: Lethally Reliable Predictor: Divorce is Equated to Homicide  with wists Bookmark NEW RESEARCH: Lethally Reliable Predictor: Divorce is Equated to Homicide  at Ma.gnolia.com wong it! Bookmark using any bookmark manager! Stumble It!

    NEW RESEARCH: Violent Homes, Violent Neighborhoods (Single Parent Families Clear Indicator)


    New Research from the Howard Center, the Family in America (April 2007) newsletter demonstrating that protecting women from domestic violence means encouraging marriage. A cause for concern are disadvantaged neighborhoods where there is a high incidence rate of single-parent households which was a clear indicator of the much higher frequency of domestic violence incidents. More cause to encourage equal custody, which is the next best thing to intact families.


    Violent Homes, Violent Neighborhoods


    Progressives never tire of decrying the evil of
    domestic violence, particularly that directed against women.
    Curiously, however, they rarely say anything about the cultural erosion
    of the social institution that best shields women from such violence: namely,
    marriage. Still, the evidence continues to accumulate
    showing that marriage matters a good deal in reducing women’s vulnerability to
    domestic violence. Indeed, a study recently published in
    Public Health Reports indicates that a woman seeking safety will
    want to live in an intact marriage herself—and in a neighborhood filled with
    intact marriages.



    Conducted by researchers at the University of Tennessee and the University of
    Cincinnati, the new study examines the effects of “contextual risk” on the
    prevalence and severity of Intimate Partner Violence (IPV).
    The Tennessee and Cincinnati scholars calculated the “contextual risk”
    for IPV for a nationally representative sample of 2,273 couples with children
    ages 5 to 17, using data collected from these couples in 1990 and 1994 by
    interviewers and Census officials. Those calculations
    highlight the importance of marital status as a predictor of Intimate Partner
    Violence.


    “As might be expected in a sample of households with school-aged children,”
    the researchers report, “stably married couples . . . have the lowest rates of
    I[ntimate]P[artner]V[iolence].” For stably married couples, the researchers
    calculate an incidence of 16.2% for overall IPV and of 3.5% for IPV involving
    “physical violence with injury.” In contrast, the
    researchers find that “cohabiting couples show the highest rates of
    IPV.” Among cohabiting couples the rate of overall
    IPV runs more than twice as high as that found among stably married couples
    (37.5% among “stable cohabiting couples”; 33.6% among “new” cohabiting
    couples). The rate of physical violence with injury runs
    four times as high as that found among stably married couples (16.1% among
    stable cohabiting couples; 14.1% among new cohabiting couples).


    Though the incidence of overall and severe IPV does run higher among newly
    married or remarried couples than among stably married couples, it still runs
    far below that observed among cohabiting couples. (The researchers report a
    rate of overall IPV of 18.7% among newly married or remarried couples and a
    rate of IPV with physical violence with injury of 7.0%.)


    Nor is it just a woman’s own marital status that determines her vulnerability
    to domestic violence. The authors of the new study
    establish that “neighborhood context” also helps determine that vulnerability.
    And in determining whether a neighborhood is “advantaged” or
    “disadvantaged” the researchers look at—among other social and economic
    characteristics—the fraction of households in the neighborhood that are headed
    by single parents. When that fraction rises, the
    neighborhood becomes more disadvantaged.


    The researchers note that, compared to violence-free couples, “couples with
    IPV are more likely . . . to live in neighborhoods of high disadvantage.”
    Among couples who reported Intimate Partner Violence, 27.3% lived in
    disadvantaged neighborhoods; among couples who reported no IPV, only 18.3%.
    Among couples who reported severe domestic violence involving injury,
    more than a third (35.2%) lived in disadvantaged neighborhoods, compared to
    less than a fifth (19.1%) of those who reported no severe domestic violence.
    Statistical tests identify all of these neighborhood-context effects as
    significant (p < 0.001 for all neighborhood effects).


    Those truly intent on reducing the incidence of domestic abuse are those at
    work to reverse the national retreat from marriage.


    (Source: Greer Litton Fox and Michael L. Benson, “Household and Neighborhood
    Contexts of Intimate Partner Violence,” Public Health Reports 121 [2006]:
    419-427.)


    Posted by
    Lary Holland
    in Studies at 14:43 | Comments (0) | Trackbacks (0)
    Defined tags for this entry: greer litton, intimate partner violence, michael l. benson, public health reports, studies
    Bookmark NEW RESEARCH: Violent Homes, Violent Neighborhoods (Single Parent Families Clear Indicator)  at del.icio.us Digg NEW RESEARCH: Violent Homes, Violent Neighborhoods (Single Parent Families Clear Indicator) Mixx NEW RESEARCH: Violent Homes, Violent Neighborhoods (Single Parent Families Clear Indicator) Bloglines NEW RESEARCH: Violent Homes, Violent Neighborhoods (Single Parent Families Clear Indicator) Technorati NEW RESEARCH: Violent Homes, Violent Neighborhoods (Single Parent Families Clear Indicator) Fark this: NEW RESEARCH: Violent Homes, Violent Neighborhoods (Single Parent Families Clear Indicator) Bookmark NEW RESEARCH: Violent Homes, Violent Neighborhoods (Single Parent Families Clear Indicator)  at YahooMyWeb Bookmark NEW RESEARCH: Violent Homes, Violent Neighborhoods (Single Parent Families Clear Indicator)  at Furl.net Bookmark NEW RESEARCH: Violent Homes, Violent Neighborhoods (Single Parent Families Clear Indicator)  at reddit.com Bookmark NEW RESEARCH: Violent Homes, Violent Neighborhoods (Single Parent Families Clear Indicator)  at blinklist.com Bookmark NEW RESEARCH: Violent Homes, Violent Neighborhoods (Single Parent Families Clear Indicator)  at Spurl.net Bookmark NEW RESEARCH: Violent Homes, Violent Neighborhoods (Single Parent Families Clear Indicator)  at NewsVine Bookmark NEW RESEARCH: Violent Homes, Violent Neighborhoods (Single Parent Families Clear Indicator)  at Simpy.com Bookmark NEW RESEARCH: Violent Homes, Violent Neighborhoods (Single Parent Families Clear Indicator)  at blogmarks Bookmark NEW RESEARCH: Violent Homes, Violent Neighborhoods (Single Parent Families Clear Indicator)  with wists Bookmark NEW RESEARCH: Violent Homes, Violent Neighborhoods (Single Parent Families Clear Indicator)  at Ma.gnolia.com wong it! Bookmark using any bookmark manager! Stumble It!

    Thursday, July 19. 2007

    Request to Representative Brenda Clack: Bring HB4564 Up For Discussion

    I took the time to write Honorable Representative Brenda Clack, Representative Joel Sheltrown, and the sponsors of House Bill 4564 this evening urging for a referral to Chairperson Clack to bring House Bill 4564, Michigan's Presumption of Equal Custody Bill, to the floor for discussion and debate. 

    Dear Hon. Representative Brenda Clack,

                My name is Lary Holland, a father and former litigant in an extremely litigious child custody dispute arising in several counties that should have resulted in a split-custody arrangement that would have been great for my children, fair for both parents, and appropriate for taxpayers. The outcome, however, was over three years of litigation, a significant drain on community resources, my children being deprived of meaningful access to their one and only father, and my no longer contributing to Michigan’s high-tech industry in a leading metropolitan corridor. There are additional ramifications that resulted from Michigan’s policy over the family too numerous to list here.

                Michigan needs a presumption of equal custody because it is fair for taxpayers, parents, and children. A presumption of equal custody eliminates the necessity of parents to feud over parenting time and children because there will no longer be an enabling negative family law policy supporting back and forth fighting over the children unless there are actual provable reasons on why one parent should not have substantially equal custody of their child(ren).

                Michigan needs to bring family law policy inline with Constitutional expectations, whereas a protected right should not be infringed upon unless all Constitutional protections are afforded the accused or deprived. Right now, when there are two fit, willing, and caring parents “fighting with the winner takes all philosophy” the children lose substantially because the parents stay enmeshed in the battle, projecting animosity to their children. The children should not be fought over, unless there is good reason to strictly limit one parent’s interaction with their children. House Bill 4564 levels the playing field and will reduce this tug-of-war dramatically when there are two fit, willing, and caring parents involved, freeing up court resources, time, and tax dollars because parents will no longer be enabled to fight with the winner take all philosophy over total domination of their children. Parental litigants will be directed to properly divide the time with their children a substantially equal amount of time. This bill does nothing for those that willfully abandon their children and do not have an interest in equally parenting their children.

                House Bill 4564 takes into account domestic violence concerns, because if an individual parent is perpetrating a continual act of domestic violence the evidence can be presented resulting in conviction of the offending party, and quite possibly showing that the offending party is also unfit as a parent. The bill does not go far enough to provide for a penalty to parents that fail to work together as equal parents, which would encourage and reward good behavior instead of the current atmosphere of alienation and family feuding. Policing for positive outcomes helps shape Michigan’s family law policy to support equal parents and towards punishing those that continue to enmesh themselves in a winner take all pattern of conduct.

                I hope you take into account the growing support across the State of the Equal Custody concept. This issue needs to be brought to debate early and discussed fully to come to a resolve in the committee that equal custody is good for parents, great for children, and honest for taxpayers. We need to free up community resources and focus again on parents being parents instead of adversaries in a courtroom. I have sent a copy of this letter to my Representative, Joel Sheltrown as well as all of the sponsors of the House Bill requesting referral for this bill to be brought up for discussion and thoroughly investigated.

                Should you have any questions about my position on this issue you may reach me toll-free at 800-319-4955 ext. 3. I would also like to be invited to any hearings that might be scheduled on House Bill 4564. Thank you for your consideration on these matters.

    Respectfully Submitted,

    /s/ /s/

    Lary Holland

    Michigan Family Court Problems

    P.O. Box 107

    Oscoda, MI 48750

    Continue reading "Request to Representative Brenda Clack: Bring..." »
    Posted by
    Lary Holland
    in Correspondence at 07:13 | Comments (0) | Trackbacks (0)
    Defined tags for this entry: billhuizenga@house.mi.gov, correspondence, equal custody, equal parenting, family court, fultonsheen@house.mi.gov, goeffhansen@house.mi.gov, hb4564, house of representatives, jackbrandenburg@house.mi.gov, jackhoogendyk@house.mi.gov, jimmarleau@house.mi.gov, joelsheltrown@house.mi.gov, johnpastor@house.mi.gov, johnstahl@house.mi.gov, judyemmons@house.mi.gov, kevingreen@house.mi.gov, lansing, lary holland, lorencewenke@house.mi.gov, martyknollenberg@house.mi.gov, michigan, repbrianpalmer@house.mi.gov, rickjones@house.mi.gov, rickshaffer@house.mi.gov
    Bookmark Request to Representative Brenda Clack: Bring HB4564 Up For Discussion  at del.icio.us Digg Request to Representative Brenda Clack: Bring HB4564 Up For Discussion Mixx Request to Representative Brenda Clack: Bring HB4564 Up For Discussion Bloglines Request to Representative Brenda Clack: Bring HB4564 Up For Discussion Technorati Request to Representative Brenda Clack: Bring HB4564 Up For Discussion Fark this: Request to Representative Brenda Clack: Bring HB4564 Up For Discussion Bookmark Request to Representative Brenda Clack: Bring HB4564 Up For Discussion  at YahooMyWeb Bookmark Request to Representative Brenda Clack: Bring HB4564 Up For Discussion  at Furl.net Bookmark Request to Representative Brenda Clack: Bring HB4564 Up For Discussion  at reddit.com Bookmark Request to Representative Brenda Clack: Bring HB4564 Up For Discussion  at blinklist.com Bookmark Request to Representative Brenda Clack: Bring HB4564 Up For Discussion  at Spurl.net Bookmark Request to Representative Brenda Clack: Bring HB4564 Up For Discussion  at NewsVine Bookmark Request to Representative Brenda Clack: Bring HB4564 Up For Discussion  at Simpy.com Bookmark Request to Representative Brenda Clack: Bring HB4564 Up For Discussion  at blogmarks Bookmark Request to Representative Brenda Clack: Bring HB4564 Up For Discussion  with wists Bookmark Request to Representative Brenda Clack: Bring HB4564 Up For Discussion  at Ma.gnolia.com wong it! Bookmark using any bookmark manager! Stumble It!

    Tuesday, July 17. 2007

    Flint Talk Video Guys: Studio 1714: What's Brenda Clack's Reasoning?


    The Studio Guys at Studio 1714 are at it again with another excellent piece on Equal Parenting, Friend of the Court Abuse of Power, and Representative Brenda Clack holding up Michigan House bill 4564!


    "Originally only a program to serve the needy has evolved into a program to serve the greedy," states Lary Holland. He further states that, "The Judges and Friend of the Court are the gatekeepers to debtors' prison in Michigan."


    John Wilson, "How can they pay if they are in jail?"


    "Parenting is a protected liberty, the friend of the court routinely takes away a significant amount of custody from a fit, willing, and caring parent and assign all the benefit nearly to one parent and most the burden, including financial burden, to the other parent," Holland elaborates.

    "It's a double whammi", states Steve Brewer.


    "It's like a snowball [effect]," further states John Wilson.

    Brenda Clack is holding up Michigan House Bill 4564, Michigan's Presumption of Equal Custody Bill which raises the standards to keep both fit, willing, and competent parents in children's lives.



    Posted by
    Lary Holland
    in Video at 15:33 | Comments (0) | Trackbacks (0)
    Defined tags for this entry: brenda clack, hb4564, house bill, lary holland, people and faces, studio 1714, video, youtube
    Bookmark Flint Talk Video Guys: Studio 1714: What's Brenda Clack's Reasoning?  at del.icio.us Digg Flint Talk Video Guys: Studio 1714: What's Brenda Clack's Reasoning? Mixx Flint Talk Video Guys: Studio 1714: What's Brenda Clack's Reasoning? Bloglines Flint Talk Video Guys: Studio 1714: What's Brenda Clack's Reasoning? Technorati Flint Talk Video Guys: Studio 1714: What's Brenda Clack's Reasoning? Fark this: Flint Talk Video Guys: Studio 1714: What's Brenda Clack's Reasoning? Bookmark Flint Talk Video Guys: Studio 1714: What's Brenda Clack's Reasoning?  at YahooMyWeb Bookmark Flint Talk Video Guys: Studio 1714: What's Brenda Clack's Reasoning?  at Furl.net Bookmark Flint Talk Video Guys: Studio 1714: What's Brenda Clack's Reasoning?  at reddit.com Bookmark Flint Talk Video Guys: Studio 1714: What's Brenda Clack's Reasoning?  at blinklist.com Bookmark Flint Talk Video Guys: Studio 1714: What's Brenda Clack's Reasoning?  at Spurl.net Bookmark Flint Talk Video Guys: Studio 1714: What's Brenda Clack's Reasoning?  at NewsVine Bookmark Flint Talk Video Guys: Studio 1714: What's Brenda Clack's Reasoning?  at Simpy.com Bookmark Flint Talk Video Guys: Studio 1714: What's Brenda Clack's Reasoning?  at blogmarks Bookmark Flint Talk Video Guys: Studio 1714: What's Brenda Clack's Reasoning?  with wists Bookmark Flint Talk Video Guys: Studio 1714: What's Brenda Clack's Reasoning?  at Ma.gnolia.com wong it! Bookmark using any bookmark manager! Stumble It!

    Wednesday, July 11. 2007

    CHEATED: A DOCUMENTED ACCOUNT OF PARENTAL ALIENATION SYNDROME (PAS)

    Click the image to order Cheated, for only $16.95, by Minister and Father Ronald Smith of Grand Rapids, MI.

    Click to Order Cheated today by clicking the link below or the image of the book and show your support for individuals that are leading the way to expose the Family Court Money Game for what it truly is.

    Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS) is the teaching of children of divorce or separation to harbor negative feelings and emotions toward the parent who generally does not have custody and does not reside in the same domicile. This is usually done in an effort for one parent to gain the respect and love of the children, while destroying the image and relationship of the absent parent. This phenomenon will generate feelings of hatred, ambivalence, and distance between children and the non-custodial parent. Our family court system does little to eliminate these occurrences, and although the parent affected is cheated of a normal relationship with the children, the real damage will manifest itself within the children.  


    Check out these other books Related to Parental Alienation Syndrome and the effects of divorce and custody disputes on children: