Well today I sent off to attorney Peter Walsh (Pete Walsh, Grand Rapids, MI) my Request for Production. These don't need to be filed in the court yet, unless he objects to them. These are sent directly to the opposing counsel/party. He has 28 days to respond or object. Some of you might remember Attorney Peter Walsh's frivolous subpoena attempt that I have a pending Motion to Quash, well he should have followed MCR 2.310 like my attached example. The entire litigation document is attached in its' entirety for interested individuals to read. Obviously there are some formatting challenges with the new software that are still in the works but all of the text is there in it's entirety.
Monday, September 12. 2005
Request for Production
STATE OF MICHIGAN
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF KENT
___________
ANNALISE MCMENAMIN,
PLAINTIFF, FILE: 03-09173-DC
VS. HON. G. PATRICK HILLARY
LARY HOLLAND (Pro Se), DEFENDANT’S REQUEST FOR
DEFENDANT. PRODUCTION
-------------------------------------------------/
Lary Holland
Defendant (Pro Se)
5180 Cedar Lake Rd.
Oscoda, MI 48750
(989) 747-0079
-------------------------------------------------/
Peter P. Walsh (P28040)
Attorney for Plaintiff
4790 Cascade Rd. S.E.
Grand Rapids, MI 49546
(616) 942-1111
------------------------------------------------/
To: Annalise McMenamin
c/o Peter Walsh
4790 Cascade Rd. S.E.
Grand Rapids, MI 49546
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the following Request for Production are directed to you under the provisions of M.C.R. 2.310 and the various subsections thereof. You are required to provide a written response within 28 days after service of the request and to furnish such information in answer to said Request for Production as is available to you. The information available to you shall include all knowledge possessed by your attorneys, investigators, insurance carriers, or such carriers’ agents, investigators, officers or employees. You may provide copies of all documents request to us or make the requested documents available for review and copying at the officers of your attorneys within usual business hours.
Documents includes writings, drawings, graphs, charts, photographs, phono records, and other data compilations from which information can be obtained, translated, if necessary, by the respondent through detection devices into reasonably usable form.
- REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION: Please provide any Nextel telephone bills and call records covering the telephone number 616-885-2792 for the following months March, April, May, June, July, August of the year 2005.
- REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION: Please provide copies, or make available for inspection and duplication, any electronic recordings made by Plaintiff or her agents during the pendency of this litigation, whether on tape or other digital format, of telephone conversations between either the Plaintiff and Lary Holland or otherwise whereas Lary Holland has been a party to the telephone call.
- REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION: Please provide copies, or make available for inspection and duplication, any electronic recordings made by Plaintiff or her agents during the pendency of this litigation, whether on tape or other digital format, of telephone conversations where the either of the parties’ minor children have been a party while they have been speaking with Defendant, Lary Holland or whereas the parties’ minor children are speaking with Plaintiff while in Defendant’s physical custody.
- REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION: Please provide copies of any W-2’s received by Plaintiff in the years 2003, 2004, or 2005.
- REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION: Please provide copies or make available for inspection of any wage and earnings statements received by Plaintiff in the year 2005.
- REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION: Please provide copies or make available for inspection any documents, invoices, attendance records, and journal entries received by Plaintiff from Connie Maile or other daycare providers pertaining to the care of the parties’ minor children Esilanna and Lary for the years 2003, 2004, and 2005.
- REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION: Please provide copies or make available for inspection of any journal entries created by Plaintiff in their entirety, of which portions have already been submitted to the Kent County Friend of the Court during the pendency of this case.
- REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION: Please provide copies or make available for inspection any documents from third parties received by Plaintiff that may be used as evidence in the case at hand.
- REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION: Please provide copies or make available for inspection any applications for Social Services, child therapy programs, school, extra-curricular programs, or any other services sought by Plaintiff on behalf of the parties’ minor children.
Respectfully Submitted,
DATED: 09/12/2005 By:__________________
Lary Holland
5180 Cedar Lake Rd.
Oscoda, MI 48750
Who Is Keeping Score?
People Want To Unelect Judge Kathleen Feeney! Grand Rapids, MI
A Few Kent County, Michigan Judges Should Be Sent A Copy of the Same Order
Meet Susan Borovich, St. Clair County's Slave Master
Holland Prepares Filing In State Supreme Court Against Kent County
