Lary Holland: Official Blog, Links, and Resources

Trial by Money Host, Robert Neff, joined Get Your Justice Live with Lary Holland on Wednesday October 29, 2008. The two had a casual discussion on what just about anyone can do to get involved with reforming the many problems that exist in today's hostile family court environment. Robert Neff discussed his campaign against the retention of one Illinois Judge as well as the a variety of topics ranging from the "End of America" to "Non-Violent Civil Disobedience." Listen today if you missed the live broadcast.

Get Your Justice Live airs live every Sunday and Wednesday Night at 8PM Eastern. Free advocacy conference calls are available on Monday evenings, also at 8PM Eastern. Find out what others are doing and learn how you can help reshape our nation's hostile family court system and balance the government's failed policies dealing with our families.

To participate live via telephone, call in during our live broadcast at:

Live Call Ins: 724-444-7444

Talk Cast Id: 43507

Need a pin: 1+#

As always you can visit our broadcast website at http://www.getyourjusticelive.com or subscribe to our xml/rss feed at http://feeds.feedburner.com/GetOffTheBench.

Get Your Justice Live Episode 53: Special Edition: Elder Abuse/ Judge Martha Anderson

Judicial Watch: Attorney David Carl Anderson Had License to Practice Law Previously Suspended.

Oakland County Judicial Candidate Has Had At Least One Prior Run In With State Bar Association.

By Lary Holland
Family Court Reports: http://www.laryholland.com/serendipity
(1/15/2008)

Oakland County, MI. A previously sanctioned Attorney, David Carl Anderson, recently filed candidacy papers through the State of Michigan’s Bureau of Elections. The candidacy papers announced his Judicial Candidacy as well as provided notice of the formation of a Committee to Elect. Attorney David Carl Anderson is also the current spouse of a sitting Oakland County Circuit Judge, Hon. Martha Anderson, at the time of this writing. According to the documents filed by his law office, David Carl Anderson is seeking to run for the judicial “vacancies created by the retirement of Judge Steven N. Andrews and Judge Fred Mester.”

Download the Complete PDF Report about Attorney David Carl Anderson.

My Open Response to Dr. Stephen Baskerville that is published here and at http://www.mensnewsdaily.com

Stephen and friends,

I am proud to call some of you my friends and others I am proud to say that you are not. Even if you are not my friends, I would support you and the goals within the realm of our shared desire to be with our children and to assure that our children will not experience what many of us hardened family court veterans have regretfully experienced.

I received Dr. Stephen Baskerville's Open letter and read through it completely. I was compelled immediately to check my now meager checking account. I had a mere $115.00 left over, after I paid some of my bills, that was to last until the upcoming Friday. Remembering again how I had tens of thousands of dollars in that same account before I met the family court system. Now, I have been in and out of work because of a serious accident in June that has resulted in some lingering effects to my head and body. My hospital bills and finances are catastrophic, and I am barely hanging onto my own home. I went to the ACFC website and immediately signed up for an Associate Level ($65.00) Membership Account.

Why did I sign up for an organization that is having problems? Because Stephen asked me to with his letter. HE has my support, because I believe that he fully understands many of the issues that we have struggled on a local and regional footprint to bring to the forefront. I may not agree with everything and may have some personal differences to Dr. Baskerville's ideologies but I would assist Dr. Baskerville whether an organization was behind him or not. I would do so with my last dollar and every bit of my other resources and expertise because of the things that we do agree on.

I don't fully believe that the problems we are faced with are limited to just the family court system. I believe that the problems that we are faced with are systemic of a constituency that loses sight of what our country was founded upon. We need to again stand together and rise above the apathy and personal issues that we have for or against one another and look to the issues that we can work together on. The system thrives on division, and we are often times the best ones at supporting the very thing that tears us down simply by not rising above the personal issues that keep us apart in our "demands for change."

I have always stayed away from other organizations because I could not fully agree with any single one of them. So today, I join the ACFC and hope that others will follow. I stand with Dr. Baskerville and with other parents that want to help shape the world into a better place for our children and subsequent generations. I love my children, and I don't want them to have to endure the feeling of their children not being able to be with them. It's bad enough that they already feel the pain of not being with one of their parents.

Dr. Stephen Baskerville has my support, and together we will all help change the course of society for our children.

Lary Holland
http://www.laryholland.com
800-319-4955 x3

A recent I-Team investigations by John Mercure, TMJ4 in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, seemed very irresponsible by falling prey to printing the same bureaucratic spin that is being released all over the country by concerned child support collection officers that are trying to keep their comfy government jobs at the expense of the taxpayers. Instead of rebutting the article, I took a moment to look up some statistics regarding Wisconsin's Title IV-D child support program.

• Most child support collections are made for families who have never been on assistance! The program was originally intended to recuperate money expended by the federal government to the states for their welfare programs. Now the taxpayer is caught funding a glorified collection service for middle and upper income feuding families!
• The most effective form of collection is through income withholding orders through Fiscal Year 2006. Income Withholding Orders are an automated task that doesn't require employees.
• The Financial Data Match program is a computer generated list that is matched up electronically by the State's data contractors. This sweeps money from obligors' accounts automatically and doesn't take additional employees.
• Federal and State Income Tax Off-Sets are another highly effective method of collection child support according to the federal government reports on Child Support collections. This again does not take additional employees.
• Wisconsin's Total Administrative Expenses, which as of today are unaudited and likely to be plagued with immense overspending, total $108,692,436.00! At least $777,010.00 of the administrative expenses weren't even for Title IV-D / Collection services.
• NON-TANF (should be income ineligible to receive government services at taxpayer expense) collections continued to increase in Fiscal Year 2006, While the collections on cases that are Welfare cases DECLINED according to federal reports.
• Wisconsin has a central child support distribution center for receiving and distributing child support funds and the local county offices no longer perform this intensive function.

The program should become more efficient over time and require less employees and the middle and upper income feuding families should be removed from the program, instead the program is getting larger and claiming to need more funds to operate. The State should not focus their programs on revenue generation but on aid to needy families. This will save the taxpayers immensely. An equal custody mandate would go along way in solving expense problems as well.

A final note on child support is that the I-TEAM should be focusing its attention on ensuring that the State of Wisconsin doesn't steal money from these poor children by not distributing collected child support. In Fiscal Year 2006 there is NET UNDISTRIBUTED CHILD SUPPORT COLLECTIONS OF $8,210,847 according to the Federal Child Support Preliminary Report for 2006. Of that Net UDC at least 8.6% of it has been completely unresolved. If this money is not distributed within one year from the date of collection the state is allowed to escheat the money into its own budget as program income, taking it out of reach of the children it was collected for! This makes it worthwhile for the State to sit on the money. Why not locate these parents and get this money distributed before it is stolen from these poor children!

John Mercure's email address is jmercure@todaystmj4.com.You can voice your opinion on the subject to him via email or peruse his blog, which has a few child support issues listed at http://www.todaystmj4.com/bloggers/mercure. Let me know if you get a response to your inquiries and I would be happy to post them here at this site.